Personal tools
Home : News & Issues : News & Issues in Cultural Heritage : UN vandals spray graffiti on Sahara’s prehistoric art
Document Actions

UN vandals spray graffiti on Sahara’s prehistoric art

by Gary Nurkin last modified 02-28-2008 12:00 PM

UN vandals spray graffiti on Sahara’s prehistoric art

Dalya Alberge, Arts Correspondent
Spectacular prehistoric depictions of animal and human figures created
up to 6,000 years ago on Western Saharan rocks have been vandalised by
United Nations peacekeepers, The Times has learnt.
Archaeological sites boasting ancient paintings and engravings of
giraffes, buffalo and elephants have been defaced within the past two
years by personnel attached to the UN mission, known by its French
acronym, Minurso.
Graffiti, some of it more than a metre high and sprayed with paint
meant for use for marking routes, now blights the rock art at Lajuad,
an isolated site known as Devil Mountain, which is regarded by the
local Sahrawi population as a mystical place of great cultural
significance.
Many of the UN “graffiti artists” signed and dated their work,
revealing their identities and where they are from. Minurso personnel
stationed in Western Sahara come from almost 30 countries. They are
monitoring a ceasefire between the occupying Moroccan forces and the
Polisario Front, which is seeking independence.
One Croatian peacekeeper scrawled “Petar CroArmy” across a rock face.
Extensive traces of pigment from rock painting are visible underneath.
Another left behind Cyrillic graffiti, and “Evgeny” from Russia
scribbled AUI, the code for the Minurso base at Aguanit. “Mahmoud”
from Egypt left his mark at Rekeiz Lemgasem, and “Ibrahim” wrote his
name and number over a prehistoric painting of a giraffe. “Issa”, a
Kenyan major who signed his name and wrote the date, had just
completed a UN course, Ethics in Peacekeeping, documents show.
Julian J. Harston, the UN’s representative of the Secretary-General
for Western Sahara and head of Minurso, said that he had been shocked
by the scale of the vandalism. After visiting two of the sites,
including Devil Mountain, this week, he said: “I was appalled. You’d
think some of them would know better. These are officers, not
squaddies.” The UN would take action against any officers “kind enough
to leave their calling card. We will report it to the
troop-contributing countries. We can move them.”
The extent of the damage is revealed in a report by Nick Brooks, of
the University of East Anglia, and Joaquim Soler, of the University of
Gerona, Spain, which was passed to The Times yesterday. It outlines
the “severe vandalism”, saying that it “now appears to be an
essentially universal practice when Minurso staff visit rock art sites
. . . Minurso staff have felt entitled to destroy elements of Western
Sahara’s and the Sahrawis’ cultural heritage, despite being aware of
UN ethics in peacekeeping, and in breach of legislation enshrined in
the 1954 Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the
Event of Armed Conflict.”
It concludes: “Minurso personnel have played a major role in damaging
archaeological sites, and such staff are engaged in the systematic
defacement of valuable archaeological sites over a large area . . .
the recent damage at Lajuad is unprecedented.”
The vandalism will reignite the debate about the conduct of UN
peacekeepers after a series of scandals. Last January the UN admitted
that more than 200 of its troops had been disciplined for sex
offences, including rape and child abuse, in the preceding three
years; in May it emerged that Paki-stani peacekeepers had been trading
weapons with Congolese militia.


Powered by Plone CMS, the Open Source Content Management System

This site conforms to the following standards: