Treasure hunters cry foul
Law change would give state more of their finds
Treasure hunters cry foul
Law change would give state more of their finds
By PETER GUINTA
peter.guinta@staugustine.com
Publication Date: 10/22/08
SOUTH PONTE VEDRA BEACH -- Picture a small boat's deck piled
with seaweed, shells and wet sand, but tucked among those
natural items bright metallic flashes are visible -- gold
coins and chains, a ruby-encrusted crucifix, loose emeralds,
an official Spanish state seal from the 17th century.
Awed, you kneel near it, barely breathing the word "treasure."
Now picture Florida authorities swooping alongside in a
speedboat to confiscate the entire pile, leaving nothing.
That's what happens to people who salvage state
"archaeological resources" without a permit.
Dozens of private salvage company owners from all over Florida
drove to the Guana-Tolomato-Matanzas National Estuarine
Reserve on Tuesday to oppose restrictive new state salvage
regulations they feel are unfair.
The Division of Historical Resource wants to re-organize the
permit system and tighten requirements for more archaeological
supervision, among other proposals.
This was the last hearing to accept public input before the
rules are changed.
Right now, all salvage companies must work under a contract
with the state. About 18 firms have them. But the state hasn't
issued any new contracts for 15 years, leaving some companies
unable to stay solvent because they cannot keep what they
find.
The new rules disband the contract system and require
companies to get a permit. But the companies believe that the
state will drag its feet on issuing permits, just like it did
with contracts.
Doug Pope of Amelia Island summed up the common belief: "The
state's trying to put us out of business."
All the companies are aware that 90 percent of the artifacts
in state archives were found by private companies, so they
feel that the rules are especially ironic and ungrateful.
James Sinclair, a maritime archaeologist with Sea Rex Inc. of
St. Augustine, said the state has worked with private salvors
"only grudgingly" and issued "increasingly more difficult and
onerous" rules and regulations.
"One company discovered a 1700-era wreck and has waited 10
years for a contract," Sinclair said. "Institutions (like
universities) are required to produce none of the criteria
(private companies require). They often get their salvage
permits in 15 days. In one case, the applicant got same-day
service."
And the state never asked the industry for input on the new
rules, he said.
Ryan Wheeler, chief of the Bureau of Archaeological Research
in Tallahassee, said the rules hadn't been "substantially
revised" since 1987, but the reason no new contracts were
issued is that "nobody has found anything."
The number of permits issued will be from two to 15, state
documents said.
With a contract, the salvors typically keep 80 percent of a
find and give 20 percent to the state. The Florida Museum in
Tallahassee displays much of the treasure found over the past
20 years, including items from two Spanish galleons, the
Nuestra Senora de Atocha and the Santa Margarita, both sunk in
a storm Sept. 8, 1622, near Key West, and discovered by Mel
Fisher in 1985.
The haul: $450 million.
The salvors protested other rules in the somewhat prickly
hearing. John Brandon of Fort Pierce, a 40-year veteran of
underwater salvage and one of the Atocha workers, said the
rule requiring a marine archaeologist to be on board a search
vessel at all times is a burden that would make salvage so
expensive that no one could do it.
"This is not required," he said. "Most Florida wrecks are
widely scattered and in shallow water. An archaeologist could
be called when a find is made."
He also opposed a new rule that requires salvage vessels to
obtain a state "exploration" permit before performing
underwater radar or magnetic sweeps of an area, even if no one
goes into the water.
Bradley Williamson, president of operations for International
Marine Recovery, said some of the new rules were vague.
"They leave a lot of stuff open to interpretation," he said.
Sinclair said that the new rules would have a "profoundly
negative effect on the industry and are grossly unfair. It
fosters unscrupulous (behavior) and a great sense of
injustice."